24 March 2025
One Profession, One Standard: The Case for Unified Social Work Licensing

Dear Colleagues, Stakeholders, and Advocates of Social Work,

As Social Work Month comes to a close, we take this opportunity to reflect on the vital role of our profession and its enduring challenges. Social work is invaluable, broad, and diverse, encompassing a wide range of roles that profoundly impact individuals, families, and communities. From mental health and child welfare to healthcare and advocacy for social justice, social workers contribute at every level of society. Yet, despite the depth of our contributions, our profession remains hindered by structural and systemic issues that must be addressed.

While social work is united by shared values and a commitment to service, the lack of uniformity in how we define, regulate, and practice our work has created significant barriers. Our profession is fractured and disjointed, plagued by inconsistent licensing categories and standards across the United States. Licensing standards, categories, and continuing education requirements vary widely from state to state, resulting in confusion and inequities that undermine the profession.

This fragmentation has far-reaching consequences:

• Prevents Interstate Licensing Compacts: Without standardized licensing requirements, licensing compacts are difficult to create, leaving social workers unable to practice across state lines, a critical limitation in an increasingly virtual world.

• Inconsistent Compensation and Insurance Reimbursements: Variability in licensing categories and standards impacts social workers' ability to effectively unify and advocate for adequate pay scales and reimbursement rates.

• Inconsistent Quality of Care: Differences in post-graduate education, supervision, and licensing standards result in varying levels of service quality, which ultimately affects the individuals and communities we serve.

• Poor or Inaccurate Public Perception: The lack of uniformity contributes to misunderstanding and undervaluing of the profession, eroding trust and credibility.

• Hindered Advocacy Efforts: A fragmented profession struggles to unify and advocate effectively for improved compensation, benefits, working conditions, and public recognition.

• Disjointed Post-Graduate Education: Inconsistencies in academic and continuing education standards make it difficult for social workers to navigate their career paths and maintain professional growth.

• Lack of Preparedness and Support for Future Social Workers: Many may struggle to meet the demands of the field, ultimately discouraging them from entering or remaining in the profession. This lack of preparedness not only affects individual social workers but also contributes to a broader shortage of qualified professionals, weakening the profession’s ability to effectively serve communities in need.

• Economic Burden: A fractured and inconsistent set of standards contributes to an economic burden for those licensed in multiple jurisdictions. More money is spent on licensing fees and continuing education. One set of standards increases the accessibility of legislation for licensing compacts, reducing the expense and simplifying the process for those holding multiple licenses.

• Impact on Mentorship and Professional Outlook: As a profession deeply rooted in mentorship, social work passes down attitudes and mindsets from one generation to the next. Inconsistencies and divisions in licensing not only shape the development of new social workers but also impact the steps they take, leading to further miscommunication and gaps in knowledge about the field. A negative or resigned outlook on the profession can hinder their growth, directly and indirectly affecting their licensure preparation. However, if framed positively, the licensure process presents a valuable opportunity for emerging professionals to develop and thrive.

To address these issues, we must embrace unified standards for the profession. The ASWB Model Social Work Practice Act serves as a framework from which we can build upon to create a profession we feel proud of and supported by. By adopting uniform licensing categories, scopes of practice, supervision requirements, and continuing education requirements, we can build a stronger, more cohesive profession.

A unified approach will yield significant benefits:

• Protects New Professionals: Standardized requirements ensure clarity and fairness for emerging social workers entering the field. Ensuring adequate preparation and supervision of new social workers effectively limits “imposter syndrome” and prevents vicarious trauma.

• Protects the Public: Consistent standards enhance the quality and safety of services provided to clients.

• Enhances Service Quality: Unified education and supervision requirements promote a higher standard of care.

• Supports Compensation: A cohesive profession is better positioned to advocate for fair pay and reimbursement rates.

• Paves the Way for Interstate Licensing Compacts: Imagine a future where social workers can seamlessly provide care across state lines, ensuring continuity for clients in a virtual and mobile world.

• Standardized CEUs: Social workers could attend courses anywhere in the country and have their continuing education universally recognized.

• Enhances Trust in the Profession: Uniformity reinforces public confidence in the expertise and reliability of social workers.

Social workers challenge social injustice, yet inconsistencies in licensing standards create barriers that undermine this mission. By coming together to address these challenges, we can strengthen the foundation of social work and better fulfill our commitment to service and advocacy. Let this Social Work Month be a call to action—not only to recognize the immense value of our profession but also to push for meaningful change. Together, we can build a future where social workers are supported, empowered, and equipped to make an even greater impact.

30
signatures
26 verified
  1. Carisa Sanchez, LMSW, LADC, Social Worker, Group Practice, Hartford, CT
  2. Grace Gates, LCSW, Social Worker, Psychotherapy Practice, Livonia, MI
  3. Vivian Colon, Clinical Director, The Epilepsy Foundation, Flushing,NY
  4. Stephen M. Marson, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, UNCP, Winston-Salem
  5. Rosemarie A Salinger, Social Worker, New Horizon Counseling Center, New York City
  6. Marcela Medina, LICSW, DCPS, DC
  7. Maribel Polanco, lmsw, Fresenius Medical Center, Ewing Township
  8. Paloma Castillo, LPC, MH Counselor, US Coast Guard, Best Me Therapy, San Juan
  9. Tiffany Smith, Family Student Specialist, Mott Haven Academy Charter School, Bronx
  10. Sara Manisco Chapo, LICSW-NH, LCSW-TX, Psychotherapist, Austin, TX
  11. jose davis, nurse practitioner, Rwj, bronx
  12. caryl blackwood, Social worker, Greater Mental Health of NY, Mt. Vernon
  13. Jacqueline Guigue-Glaspell, Social Worker, Private Practice, Guelph
  14. Aisha Breland-Henry, Social Worker, Rockville Centre
  15. Keeshanna Celestin, LMSW, Creedmoor Psychiatric Hospital, Valley Stream
  16. Melissa Katz, LCSW, LIAD Center, Massapequa NY
  17. Sarah Dubicki, LMSW, Psychotherapy Practice, Ferndale, Mi
  18. Rebecca Peacock, Social worker, Sante, Charlotte
  19. Mandy Klarman, LCSW, LIAD Center, Westbury, NY
  20. Lindsay Knudsen, Social worker, N/a, Oakdale
  21. Kimberly Shaw, Licenced Clinical Social Worker, Dept. of Veterans Affairs., Bay Shore
  22. Lashawn Smith, Social worker, Private, NY
  23. Suzanne L. Velázquez, PhD, LCSW, Social Work Educator & Clinical Social Worker, Stony Brook, NY
  24. Michelle L Marsh, Social worker, DCPS, Germantown
  25. Joi Emmanuel, School Social Worker, Eastern Suffolk BOCES, West Islip
  26. anonymous, Private Practice