OPEN LETTER TO EDMONTON PRIDEFEST ASSOCIATION
Re: Community Consultation, Police Presence, Governance, and Public Accountability in Edmonton's 2026 Pride Parade and Festival
August 23, 2026
To: Trevor Watson, Tara Beltran, Connie Shields
Board of Directors
Edmonton PrideFest Association
We write as community organizations, advocates, service providers and community members seeking clear answers regarding Edmonton PrideFest's community consultation, approach to police presence, governance and public accountability.
Our concerns arise from activities conducted in 2025 and from the planning and delivery of the 2026 Pride events. They include the apparent absence of meaningful consultation with Trans and QTBIPOC communities, a significant increase in visible police presence, the proposed participation of EPS Pipes & Drums, and broader questions regarding PrideFest's governance and decision-making structures.
The August 14th withdrawal of EPS Pipes & Drums resolved one immediate issue. It did not resolve these broader questions.
Taken together, these events raise serious questions about PrideFest's governance, decision-making, community consultation and accountability. We are asking PrideFest's Board and leadership to address the following matters publicly.
GOVERNANCE & ACCOUNTABILITY
Additionally, why does a director with documented involvement in activities opposing SOGI-inclusive initiatives sit on PrideFest's Board, what standards govern Board eligibility and conduct, and what accountability process applies when a director's activities conflict with PrideFest's mandate?
Additionally, How are directors recruited, appointed or elected, what representation do Trans, Two Spirit, Black, Indigenous and racialized people have at the Board and leadership levels, and what conflict-of-interest safeguards apply?
Additionally, what formal decision-making authority did Trans Community Advisory Council (TCAC) and PrideFest's other advisory bodies possess, and who had authority to accept, reject or override their recommendations?
FINANCIAL TRANSPARENCY & PRIVACY
Additionally, What financial disclosures is PrideFest required to prepare or make available, have those obligations been met, do directors, officers or members receive compensation or service contracts, and where can the community access this information?
Additionally, what policies govern recording, consent, retention, use and disclosure of community communications, and what safeguards protect confidential and identifying information obtained through consultation?
POLICE PRESENCE & COMMUNITY SAFETY
Who decided the number, placement and visibility of police at the 2026 events, what presence was operationally required versus requested or facilitated by PrideFest, and what consultation occurred with affected communities?
What consultations and assessments did PrideFest conduct regarding the impact of increased visible police presence on community safety and participation, and what less-visible alternatives were considered?
RARICANOW AND THE 2025 TRANS MARCH
What commitments did PrideFest make following the 2025 Trans March, why was RARICAnow not formally included in 2026 planning, and what actions were taken to implement those commitments?
MEANINGFUL TRANS AND QTBIPOC COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
What meaningful Trans and QTBIPOC consultation had PrideFest completed before July 31st, and why was essential community engagement still being developed within weeks of Pride?
EPS PIPES & DRUMS
Who authorized the EPS Pipes & Drums application, why was TCAC not informed or consulted, and why was EPS participation absent from the Trans community consultation?
Who participated in the Parade Advisory Committee consultation, what communities or organizations did they formally represent, and how did PrideFest distinguish individual opinions from authorized organizational positions?
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
What concrete changes will PrideFest make to its governance, meaningful consultation, police-engagement and public accountability structures to repair public trust?
Organizations receiving public funds, relying on volunteer labour and asking marginalized communities to contribute their time, lived experience and public trust have a corresponding obligation to operate with integrity and public accountability.
Social belonging and human dignity depend in part on communities being able to trust the organizations that claim to represent them. Where that trust has been damaged, community care requires transparency, accountability and meaningful relational repair.
We request a substantive written public response to these questions.
Respectfully,
Adebayo Katiti & and the Board of Directors of RARICAnow
with
Zita Dube-Lockhart, President - The Centre for Trauma Informed Fitness
Toni Harris, Director - The Centre for Trauma Informed Fitness
Erie Melnychuk, Director - The Centre for Trauma Informed Fitness
Jason Dube-Lockhart, Treasurer - The Centre for Trauma Informed Fitness
Alison Czarnietzki, INTERA Steering Committee Chair - The Centre for Trauma Informed Fitness
Claire Pearen, Founder and Co-Organizer - Pride Corner On Whyte
Erica Posteraro, Co-Organizer - Pride Corner On Whyte
Colin Bennion, Founder - Two Guys With Wood YEG
Kris Bennion, Co-Founder - Two Guys With Wood YEG
Aligned Community Organizations, Advocates and Additional Signatories as listed below.
Please note that there was a significant omission in the original posting of this letter. Shades of Colour is one of the original signatories, and has been deeply involved in advocating on this issue since 2018.
We offer our deep gratitude to:
Rohan Parikh, Co-Organizer - Shades of Colour
Nicole Jones-Abad, Co-Organizer -
Shades of Colour
for their support in the drafting of this letter and for everything they continue to do for our community.
Their importance of their work can not be overstated, and we deeply regret this mistake.